Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate risk associations, and false-positive report probability (FPRP) analysis was also carried out to evaluate significant findings.
Although the combined analysis exhibited a weak association signal (P(combined) = 0.003263 for rs3811021), the false positive report probability (FPRP) analysis indicated it was most likely a false positive finding.
Onland-Moret et al., Utrecht, Netherlands. In Biochim Biophys Acta, 2011
The evidence of statistically significant findings was evaluated based on the number of positive replications, the ratio of positive and negative studies, and the false-positive report probability (FPRP).
Shen et al., Shanghai, China. In J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2011
We reported here only the overall positive-association results with statistical significance and evaluated the reliability of the associations by using false-positive report probability (FPRP) analysis and the Venice guidelines on genetic epidemiology studies.
Peters et al., Seattle, United States. In Jama, 2008
The summary odds ratio (OR) for 98 (28%) statistically significant associations (P value <.05) were further evaluated by estimating the false-positive report probability (FPRP) at a given prior probability and statistical power.